[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aKc97iuDAiIacRiL@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2025 18:40:30 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Qianfeng Rong <rongqianfeng@...o.com>
Cc: Giovanni Cabiddu <giovanni.cabiddu@...el.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jack Xu <jack.xu@...el.com>,
Suman Kumar Chakraborty <suman.kumar.chakraborty@...el.com>,
Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@...il.com>, qat-linux@...el.com,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] crypto: qat - use kcalloc() in
qat_uclo_map_objs_from_mof()
On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 10:20:26PM +0800, Qianfeng Rong wrote:
> As noted in the kernel documentation [1], open-coded multiplication in
> allocator arguments is discouraged because it can lead to integer overflow.
>
> Use kcalloc() to gain built-in overflow protection, making memory
> allocation safer when calculating allocation size compared to explicit
> multiplication. Similarly, use size_add() instead of explicit addition
> for 'uobj_chunk_num + sobj_chunk_num'.
FWIW,
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists