[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aKdIvHOKCQ14JlbM@google.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2025 09:26:36 -0700
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, graf@...zon.de,
Ajay Kaher <ajay.kaher@...adcom.com>, Alexey Makhalov <alexey.makhalov@...adcom.com>,
Colin Percival <cperciva@...snap.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Support "generic" CPUID timing leaf as KVM guest
and host
On Sat, Aug 16, 2025, David Woodhouse wrote:
> In https://lkml.org/lkml/2008/10/1/246 VMware proposed a generic standard
> for harmonising CPUID between hypervisors. It was mostly shot down in
> flames, but the generic timing leaf at 0x4000_0010 didn't quite die.
>
> Mostly the hypervisor leaves at 0x4000_0xxx are very hypervisor-specific,
> but XNU and FreeBSD as guests will look for 0x4000_0010 unconditionally,
> under any hypervisor. The EC2 Nitro hypervisor has also exposed TSC
> frequency information in this leaf, since 2020.
>
> As things stand, KVM guests have to reverse-calculate the TSC frequency
> from the mul/shift information given to them in the KVM clock to convert
> ticks into nanoseconds, with a corresponding loss of precision.
I would rather have the VMM use the Intel-define CPUID.0x15 to enumerate the
TSC frequency. I would also love, love, love reviews on that series.
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250227021855.3257188-36-seanjc@google.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists