[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250821124319.07843e17@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2025 12:43:19 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Bhupesh <bhupesh@...lia.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, kernel-dev@...lia.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, oliver.sang@...el.com, lkp@...el.com,
laoar.shao@...il.com, pmladek@...e.com, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
arnaldo.melo@...il.com, alexei.starovoitov@...il.com,
andrii.nakryiko@...il.com, mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl, peterz@...radead.org,
willy@...radead.org, david@...hat.com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
keescook@...omium.org, ebiederm@...ssion.com, brauner@...nel.org,
jack@...e.cz, mingo@...hat.com, juri.lelli@...hat.com, bsegall@...gle.com,
mgorman@...e.de, vschneid@...hat.com, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kees@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 4/5] treewide: Switch memcpy() users of 'task->comm'
to a more safer implementation
On Thu, 21 Aug 2025 15:51:51 +0530
Bhupesh <bhupesh@...lia.com> wrote:
> +static __always_inline void
> + __cstr_array_copy(char *dst, const char *src,
> + __kernel_size_t size)
> +{
> + memcpy(dst, src, size);
> + dst[size] = 0;
Shouldn't this be: dst[size - 1] = 0;
?
Perhaps also add:
BUILD_BUG_ON(size == 0);
-- Steve
> +}
> +
Powered by blists - more mailing lists