linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] dt-bindings: phy: qcom,sc8280xp-qmp-pcie-phy: Document the Glymur QMP PCIe PHY

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <175580569944.470925.12622150205137529754.robh@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2025 14:48:27 -0500
From: "Rob Herring (Arm)" <robh@...nel.org>
To: Wenbin Yao <wenbin.yao@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: Prudhvi Yarlagadda <quic_pyarlaga@...cinc.com>,
	Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>, qiang.yu@....qualcomm.com,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...nel.org>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
	Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Wilczyński <kwilczynski@...nel.org>,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com,
	linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] dt-bindings: phy: qcom,sc8280xp-qmp-pcie-phy:
 Document the Glymur QMP PCIe PHY


On Thu, 21 Aug 2025 02:44:28 -0700, Wenbin Yao wrote:
> From: Prudhvi Yarlagadda <quic_pyarlaga@...cinc.com>
> 
> The fifth PCIe instance on Glymur has a Gen5 4-lane PHY. Document it as a
> separate compatible.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Prudhvi Yarlagadda <quic_pyarlaga@...cinc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Wenbin Yao <wenbin.yao@....qualcomm.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,sc8280xp-qmp-pcie-phy.yaml | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 


Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However,
there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream
maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply.

If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.

Missing tags:

Acked-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@...nel.org>