lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250821200701.1329277-13-david@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2025 22:06:38 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
	Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@...gle.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...two.org>,
	Dennis Zhou <dennis@...nel.org>,
	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
	dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
	intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
	iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
	io-uring@...r.kernel.org,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
	kasan-dev@...glegroups.com,
	kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...s.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
	Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>,
	Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
	Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
	Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
	Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	virtualization@...ts.linux.dev,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
	wireguard@...ts.zx2c4.com,
	x86@...nel.org,
	Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>
Subject: [PATCH RFC 12/35] mm: limit folio/compound page sizes in problematic kernel configs

Let's limit the maximum folio size in problematic kernel config where
the memmap is allocated per memory section (SPARSEMEM without
SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP) to a single memory section.

Currently, only a single architectures supports ARCH_HAS_GIGANTIC_PAGE
but not SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP: sh.

Fortunately, the biggest hugetlb size sh supports is 64 MiB
(HUGETLB_PAGE_SIZE_64MB) and the section size is at least 64 MiB
(SECTION_SIZE_BITS == 26), so their use case is not degraded.

As folios and memory sections are naturally aligned to their order-2 size
in memory, consequently a single folio can no longer span multiple memory
sections on these problematic kernel configs.

nth_page() is no longer required when operating within a single compound
page / folio.

Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
---
 include/linux/mm.h | 22 ++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
index 77737cbf2216a..48a985e17ef4e 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm.h
@@ -2053,11 +2053,25 @@ static inline long folio_nr_pages(const struct folio *folio)
 	return folio_large_nr_pages(folio);
 }
 
-/* Only hugetlbfs can allocate folios larger than MAX_ORDER */
-#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_GIGANTIC_PAGE
-#define MAX_FOLIO_ORDER		PUD_ORDER
-#else
+#if !defined(CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_GIGANTIC_PAGE)
+/*
+ * We don't expect any folios that exceed buddy sizes (and consequently
+ * memory sections).
+ */
 #define MAX_FOLIO_ORDER		MAX_PAGE_ORDER
+#elif defined(CONFIG_SPARSEMEM) && !defined(CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP)
+/*
+ * Only pages within a single memory section are guaranteed to be
+ * contiguous. By limiting folios to a single memory section, all folio
+ * pages are guaranteed to be contiguous.
+ */
+#define MAX_FOLIO_ORDER		PFN_SECTION_SHIFT
+#else
+/*
+ * There is no real limit on the folio size. We limit them to the maximum we
+ * currently expect.
+ */
+#define MAX_FOLIO_ORDER		PUD_ORDER
 #endif
 
 #define MAX_FOLIO_NR_PAGES	(1UL << MAX_FOLIO_ORDER)
-- 
2.50.1


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ