[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250821200701.1329277-13-david@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2025 22:06:38 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@...gle.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...two.org>,
Dennis Zhou <dennis@...nel.org>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
io-uring@...r.kernel.org,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
kasan-dev@...glegroups.com,
kvm@...r.kernel.org,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...s.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>,
Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
virtualization@...ts.linux.dev,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
wireguard@...ts.zx2c4.com,
x86@...nel.org,
Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>
Subject: [PATCH RFC 12/35] mm: limit folio/compound page sizes in problematic kernel configs
Let's limit the maximum folio size in problematic kernel config where
the memmap is allocated per memory section (SPARSEMEM without
SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP) to a single memory section.
Currently, only a single architectures supports ARCH_HAS_GIGANTIC_PAGE
but not SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP: sh.
Fortunately, the biggest hugetlb size sh supports is 64 MiB
(HUGETLB_PAGE_SIZE_64MB) and the section size is at least 64 MiB
(SECTION_SIZE_BITS == 26), so their use case is not degraded.
As folios and memory sections are naturally aligned to their order-2 size
in memory, consequently a single folio can no longer span multiple memory
sections on these problematic kernel configs.
nth_page() is no longer required when operating within a single compound
page / folio.
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
---
include/linux/mm.h | 22 ++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
index 77737cbf2216a..48a985e17ef4e 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm.h
@@ -2053,11 +2053,25 @@ static inline long folio_nr_pages(const struct folio *folio)
return folio_large_nr_pages(folio);
}
-/* Only hugetlbfs can allocate folios larger than MAX_ORDER */
-#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_GIGANTIC_PAGE
-#define MAX_FOLIO_ORDER PUD_ORDER
-#else
+#if !defined(CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_GIGANTIC_PAGE)
+/*
+ * We don't expect any folios that exceed buddy sizes (and consequently
+ * memory sections).
+ */
#define MAX_FOLIO_ORDER MAX_PAGE_ORDER
+#elif defined(CONFIG_SPARSEMEM) && !defined(CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP)
+/*
+ * Only pages within a single memory section are guaranteed to be
+ * contiguous. By limiting folios to a single memory section, all folio
+ * pages are guaranteed to be contiguous.
+ */
+#define MAX_FOLIO_ORDER PFN_SECTION_SHIFT
+#else
+/*
+ * There is no real limit on the folio size. We limit them to the maximum we
+ * currently expect.
+ */
+#define MAX_FOLIO_ORDER PUD_ORDER
#endif
#define MAX_FOLIO_NR_PAGES (1UL << MAX_FOLIO_ORDER)
--
2.50.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists