lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
 <TY3PR01MB113467039A598C0EDC284AE198632A@TY3PR01MB11346.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2025 07:18:59 +0000
From: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>, biju.das.au <biju.das.au@...il.com>
CC: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>, Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...nel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Geert Uytterhoeven
	<geert+renesas@...der.be>, magnus.damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
	"linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
	Prabhakar Mahadev Lad <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 03/11] dt-bindings: phy: renesas: Document Renesas RZ/G3E
 USB3.0 PHY

Hi Conor,

Thanks for the feedback.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
> Sent: 20 August 2025 21:13
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/11] dt-bindings: phy: renesas: Document Renesas RZ/G3E USB3.0 PHY
> 
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2025 at 09:10:07PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
> 
> Now that I look again, same applies here with the different filename and compatible. Copypaste mistake?
> Or why does the compatible not match the filename?
> 

r9a09g047 is SoC part number which also known as RZ/G3E SoC.

I just followed the convention used in [1] and [2].
Please let me know, should I change rzg3e-usb3-phy.yaml.yaml-> r9a09g047-usb3-phy.yaml ?

[1]
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/Documentation/devicetree/bindings?h=next-20250820&id=44b91d61c505863b8ae90b7094aee5ca0dce808f

[2]
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/Documentation/devicetree/bindings?h=next-20250820&id=b2d25905366b4e6791f60e6bc76a636d1b88e6f8

Cheers,
Biju


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ