linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] spi: st: fix PM macros to use CONFIG_PM instead of CONFIG_PM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMuHMdXU6rSgdJ0z+ngWJ4F085OvkTSLJhJMx5jj29-4wqXktg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2025 09:29:21 +0200
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Raphael Gallais-Pou <rgallaispou@...il.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: st: fix PM macros to use CONFIG_PM instead of CONFIG_PM_SLEEP

On Wed, 20 Aug 2025 at 20:03, Raphael Gallais-Pou <rgallaispou@...il.com> wrote:
> pm_sleep_ptr() depends on CONFIG_PM_SLEEP while pm_ptr() depends on
> CONFIG_PM.  Since ST SSC4 implements runtime PM it makes sense using
> pm_ptr() here.
>
> For the same reason replace PM macros that use CONFIG_PM.  Doing so
> prevents from using __maybe_unused attribute of runtime PM functions.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAMuHMdX9nkROkAJJ5odv4qOWe0bFTmaFs=Rfxsfuc9+DT-bsEQ@mail.gmail.com
> Fixes: 6f8584a4826f ("spi: st: Switch from CONFIG_PM_SLEEP guards to pm_sleep_ptr()")
>
> Signed-off-by: Raphael Gallais-Pou <rgallaispou@...il.com>

Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds