lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250821-helpful-chupacabra-of-fury-b6b3cb@kuoka>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2025 09:50:38 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Yao Zi <ziyao@...root.org>
Cc: Drew Fustini <fustini@...nel.org>, Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>, 
	Fu Wei <wefu@...hat.com>, Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, 
	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, 
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>, Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, 
	Alexandre Ghiti <alex@...ti.fr>, Michal Wilczynski <m.wilczynski@...sung.com>, 
	linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	Icenowy Zheng <uwu@...nowy.me>, Han Gao <rabenda.cn@...il.com>, Han Gao <gaohan@...as.ac.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] reset: th1520: Support the new compatible for
 VO-subsystem controller

On Wed, Aug 20, 2025 at 07:42:44AM +0000, Yao Zi wrote:
> The reset controller for VO-subsystem is previously described with
> compatible "thead,th1520-reset", which is misleading since it implies
> control over all reset units on the SoC.
> 
> A new compatible, "thead,th1520-reset-vo", has been introduced to
> describe the controller's scope explicitly, while the old one has been
> deprecated. Let's support the compatible in the driver.
> 
> Fixes: 4a65326311ab ("reset: thead: Add TH1520 reset controller driver")
> Reported-by: Icenowy Zheng <uwu@...nowy.me>

Missing Closes tag. Explain where is the bug. "Implies" different
meaning is not a bug. You need to describe user observable issues of
this bug.

Best regards,
Krzysztof


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ