[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7db2eb2c-9566-4d6b-9f82-a0f65110a807@suse.de>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2025 11:33:59 +0200
From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>
Cc: axboe@...nel.dk, neil@...wn.name, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, colyli@...nel.org, xni@...hat.com,
yi.zhang@...wei.com, yangerkun@...wei.com, johnny.chenyi@...wei.com,
"yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: fix disordered IO in the case recursive split
On 8/21/25 11:02, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 04:56:33PM +0800, Yu Kuai wrote:
>> Can you give some examples as how to chain the right way?
>
> fs/xfs/xfs_bio_io.c: xfs_rw_bdev
> fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c: xfs_buf_submit_bio
> fs/xfs/xfs_log.c: xlog_write_iclog
>
>> BTW, for all
>> the io split case, should this order be fixed? I feel we should, this
>> disorder can happen on any stack case, where top max_sector is greater
>> than stacked disk.
>
> Yes, I've been trying get Bart to fix this for a while instead of
> putting in a workaround very similar to the one proposed here,
> but so far nothing happened.
>
>
This feels like a really stupid fix, but wouldn't that help?
diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
index 023649fe2476..2b342bb59612 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
@@ -5478,7 +5478,6 @@ static struct bio *chunk_aligned_read(struct mddev
*mddev, struct bio *raid_bio)
split = bio_split(raid_bio, sectors, GFP_NOIO,
&conf->bio_split);
bio_chain(split, raid_bio);
submit_bio_noacct(raid_bio);
- raid_bio = split;
}
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke Kernel Storage Architect
hare@...e.de +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions GmbH, Frankenstr. 146, 90461 Nürnberg
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), GF: I. Totev, A. McDonald, W. Knoblich
Powered by blists - more mailing lists