[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f997a8ec-26aa-45f3-a757-d221321c8607@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2025 12:34:41 +0200
From: Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@....com>
To: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>, Vlastimil Babka
<vbabka@...e.cz>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>, John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>, Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>, Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Nico Pache <npache@...hat.com>, Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>,
Dev Jain <dev.jain@....com>, Barry Song <baohua@...nel.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, Palmer Dabbelt
<palmer@...belt.com>, Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Alexandre Ghiti <alex@...ti.fr>, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Cc: kernel@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] selftests/mm: Add -Wunreachable-code and fix
warnings
On 21/08/2025 08:19, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/split_huge_page_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/split_huge_page_test.c
>>> index 05de1fc0005b7..a85b2e393e4e8 100644
>>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/split_huge_page_test.c
>>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/split_huge_page_test.c
>>> @@ -296,10 +296,8 @@ void split_file_backed_thp(int order)
>>> ksft_exit_fail_msg("Unable to create a tmpfs for testing\n");
>>>
>>> status = snprintf(testfile, INPUT_MAX, "%s/thp_file", tmpfs_loc);
>>> - if (status >= INPUT_MAX) {
>>> + if (status >= INPUT_MAX)
>>> ksft_exit_fail_msg("Fail to create file-backed THP split testing file\n");
>>> - goto cleanup;
>> At that point the mount() call has succeeded so I think we do want to
>> keep the goto and just print the error message instead of calling
>> replace ksft_exit_fail_msg().
> The cleanup tag does cleanup and then calls ksft_exit_fail_msg() without printing the
> actual reason of failure. So current flow seems good where information about the error
> is being printed.
My point is that with this patch, ksft_exit_fail_msg() still causes the
test to exit right away without the cleanup steps (i.e.
unmounting/removing the directory) being executed. Printing a specific
error message is good but we should also run the cleanup steps.
- Kevin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists