[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E76D5F5691FF908+20250821015305.GC1742451@nic-Precision-5820-Tower>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2025 09:53:05 +0800
From: Yibo Dong <dong100@...se.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev>, andrew+netdev@...n.ch,
davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, horms@...nel.org, corbet@....net,
gur.stavi@...wei.com, maddy@...ux.ibm.com, mpe@...erman.id.au,
danishanwar@...com, lee@...ger.us, gongfan1@...wei.com,
lorenzo@...nel.org, geert+renesas@...der.be,
Parthiban.Veerasooran@...rochip.com, lukas.bulwahn@...hat.com,
alexanderduyck@...com, richardcochran@...il.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/5] net: rnpgbe: Add n500/n210 chip support
On Wed, Aug 20, 2025 at 10:10:00PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2025 at 09:43:41AM +0800, Yibo Dong wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 19, 2025 at 02:59:09PM +0100, Vadim Fedorenko wrote:
> > > On 18/08/2025 12:28, Dong Yibo wrote:
> > > > Initialize n500/n210 chip bar resource map and
> > > > dma, eth, mbx ... info for future use.
> > > >
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > > +struct mucse_hw {
> > > > + void __iomem *hw_addr;
> > > > + void __iomem *ring_msix_base;
> > > > + struct pci_dev *pdev;
> > > > + enum rnpgbe_hw_type hw_type;
> > > > + struct mucse_dma_info dma;
> > > > + struct mucse_eth_info eth;
> > > > + struct mucse_mac_info mac;
> > > > + struct mucse_mbx_info mbx;
> > > > + u32 usecstocount;
> > >
> > > What is this field for? You don't use it anywhere in the patchset apart
> > > from initialization. Maybe it's better to introduce it once it's used?
> > > Together with the defines of values for this field...
> > >
> >
> > It is used to store chip frequency which is used to calculate values
> > related to 'delay register' in the future. I will improve this.
>
> Maybe also see if you can find a better name. count is rather
> vague. Count of what?
>
> Andrew
>
Chip use clock cycle not us(microsecond) to achieve timing. If chip is 125MHz,
driver setups a register to 125 to get 1us timing(125 * 10^6 * 10^(-6)).
Maybe usecstocycle better?
Thanks for your feedback.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists