lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f21730cf-f176-4771-8c31-3e49450e48f9@linux.dev>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2025 19:54:49 -0700
From: Zhu Yanjun <yanjun.zhu@...ux.dev>
To: Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@...bit.com>
Cc: jgg@...pe.ca, leon@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, zyjzyj2000@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rdma_rxe: call comp_handler without holding cq->cq_lock

在 2025/8/19 10:24, Philipp Reisner 写道:
> Allow the comp_handler callback implementation to call ib_poll_cq().
> A call to ib_poll_cq() calls rxe_poll_cq() with the rdma_rxe driver.
> And rxe_poll_cq() locks cq->cq_lock. That leads to a spinlock deadlock.
> 
> The Mellanox and Intel drivers allow a comp_handler callback
> implementation to call ib_poll_cq().
> 
> Avoid the deadlock by calling the comp_handler callback without
> holding cq->cq_lock.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@...bit.com>
> ---

The new patch should be sent in a new mail thread; it is not appropriate 
to reply to the old thread.

Additionally:

The subject line does not include a version number.

The commit log of the new patch does not contain a changelog.

Other than these issues, I am fine with this commit.

Reviewed-by: Zhu Yanjun <yanjun.zhu@...ux.dev>

Zhu Yanjun

>   drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_cq.c | 6 +++++-
>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_cq.c b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_cq.c
> index fffd144d509e..95652001665d 100644
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_cq.c
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_cq.c
> @@ -88,6 +88,7 @@ int rxe_cq_post(struct rxe_cq *cq, struct rxe_cqe *cqe, int solicited)
>   	int full;
>   	void *addr;
>   	unsigned long flags;
> +	bool invoke_handler = false;
>   
>   	spin_lock_irqsave(&cq->cq_lock, flags);
>   
> @@ -113,11 +114,14 @@ int rxe_cq_post(struct rxe_cq *cq, struct rxe_cqe *cqe, int solicited)
>   	if ((cq->notify & IB_CQ_NEXT_COMP) ||
>   	    (cq->notify & IB_CQ_SOLICITED && solicited)) {
>   		cq->notify = 0;
> -		cq->ibcq.comp_handler(&cq->ibcq, cq->ibcq.cq_context);
> +		invoke_handler = true;
>   	}
>   
>   	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cq->cq_lock, flags);
>   
> +	if (invoke_handler)
> +		cq->ibcq.comp_handler(&cq->ibcq, cq->ibcq.cq_context);
> +
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ