[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <79027c6f-f2f3-41b2-9ff3-c5576fc06c5c@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2025 10:08:30 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@...cle.com>
Cc: Liam.Howlett@...cle.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, andreyknvl@...il.com,
aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com, anshuman.khandual@....com, apopple@...dia.com,
ardb@...nel.org, arnd@...db.de, bp@...en8.de, cl@...two.org,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, david@...hat.com, dennis@...nel.org,
dev.jain@....com, dvyukov@...gle.com, glider@...gle.com,
gwan-gyeong.mun@...el.com, hpa@...cr.com, jane.chu@...cle.com,
jgross@...e.de, jhubbard@...dia.com, joao.m.martins@...cle.com,
joro@...tes.org, kas@...nel.org, kevin.brodsky@....com,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com, luto@...nel.org,
maobibo@...ngson.cn, mhocko@...e.com, mingo@...hat.com, osalvador@...e.de,
peterx@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, rppt@...nel.org,
ryabinin.a.a@...il.com, ryan.roberts@....com, stable@...r.kernel.org,
surenb@...gle.com, tglx@...utronix.de, thuth@...hat.com, tj@...nel.org,
urezki@...il.com, vbabka@...e.cz, vincenzo.frascino@....com, x86@...nel.org,
zhengqi.arch@...edance.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm: fix KASAN build error due to p*d_populate_kernel()
On 8/21/25 18:11, Harry Yoo wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 10:36:12AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
>> On 8/21/25 04:57, Harry Yoo wrote:
>>> However, {pgd,p4d}_populate_kernel() is defined as a function regardless
>>> of the number of page table levels, so the compiler may not optimize
>>> them away. In this case, the following linker error occurs:
>
> Hi, thanks for taking a look, Dave!
>
> First of all, this is a fix-up patch of a mm-hotfixes patch series that
> fixes a bug (I should have explained that in the changelog) [1].
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20250818020206.4517-1-harry.yoo@oracle.com
>
> I think we can continue discussing it and perhaps do that as part of
> a follow-up series, because the current patch series need to be backported
> to -stable and your suggestion to improve existing code doesn't require
> -stable backports.
>
> Does that sound fine?
>
>> This part of the changelog confused me. I think it's focusing on the
>> wrong thing.
>>
>> The code that's triggering this is literally:
>>
>>> pgd_populate(&init_mm, pgd,
>>> lm_alias(kasan_early_shadow_p4d));
>>
>> It sure _looks_ like it's unconditionally referencing the
>> 'kasan_early_shadow_p4d' symbol. I think it's wrong to hide that with
>> macro magic and just assume that the macros won't reference it.
>>
>> If a symbol isn't being defined, it shouldn't be referenced in C code.:q
>
> A fair point, and that's what KASAN code has been doing for years.
>
>> The right way to do it is to have an #ifdef in a header that avoids
>> compiling in the reference to the symbol.
>
> You mean defining some wrapper functions for p*d_populate_kernel() in
> KASAN with different implementations based on ifdeffery?
That would work.
So would something like:
#if CONFIG_PGTABLE_LEVELS >= 4
extern p4d_t kasan_early_shadow_p4d[MAX_PTRS_PER_P4D];
#else
#define kasan_early_shadow_p4d NULL
#endif
> Just to clarify, what should be the exact ifdeffery to cover these cases?
> #if CONFIG_PGTABLE_LEVELS == 4 and 5, or
> #ifdef __PAGETABLE_P4D_FOLDED and __PAGETABLE_PUD_FOLDED ?
>
> I have no strong opinion on this, let's hear what KASAN folks think.
I think CONFIG_PGTABLE_LEVELS works, but in the end I'm not picky about
the specific #ifdefs that work.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists