lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d4bc2c95-7e25-4d76-994f-b68f1ead8119@lunn.ch>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2025 19:17:55 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Kory Maincent <kory.maincent@...tlin.com>
Cc: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	kernel@...gutronix.de,
	Dent Project <dentproject@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: pse-pd: pd692x0: Add sysfs interface
 for configuration save/reset

On Fri, Aug 22, 2025 at 05:37:02PM +0200, Kory Maincent wrote:
> From: Kory Maincent (Dent Project) <kory.maincent@...tlin.com>
> 
> Add sysfs attributes save_conf and reset_conf to enable userspace
> management of the PSE's permanent configuration stored in EEPROM.
> 
> The save_conf attribute allows saving the current configuration to
> EEPROM by writing '1'. The reset_conf attribute restores factory
> defaults and reinitializes the port matrix configuration.

I'm not sure sysfs is the correct interface for this.

Lets take a step back.

I assume ethtool will report the correct state after a reboot when the
EEPROM has content? The driver does not hold configuration state which
cannot be represented in the EEPROM?

Is the EEPROM mandatory, or optional? Is it built into the controller?

How fast is it to store the settings?

I'm wondering if rather than having this sysfs parameter, you just
store every configuration change? That could be more intuitive.

I've not looked at the sysfs documentation. Are there other examples
of such a property?

      Andrew

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ