lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250822033343.3000289-1-wutengda@huaweicloud.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2025 03:33:43 +0000
From: Tengda Wu <wutengda@...weicloud.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Tengda Wu <wutengda@...weicloud.com>
Subject: [PATCH -next v3] ftrace: Fix potential warning in trace_printk_seq during ftrace_dump

When calling ftrace_dump_one() concurrently with reading trace_pipe,
a WARN_ON_ONCE() in trace_printk_seq() can be triggered due to a race
condition.

The issue occurs because:

CPU0 (ftrace_dump)                              CPU1 (reader)
echo z > /proc/sysrq-trigger

!trace_empty(&iter)
trace_iterator_reset(&iter) <- len = size = 0
                                                cat /sys/kernel/tracing/trace_pipe
trace_find_next_entry_inc(&iter)
  __find_next_entry
    ring_buffer_empty_cpu <- all empty
  return NULL

trace_printk_seq(&iter.seq)
  WARN_ON_ONCE(s->seq.len >= s->seq.size)

In the context between trace_empty() and trace_find_next_entry_inc()
during ftrace_dump, the ring buffer data was consumed by other readers.
This caused trace_find_next_entry_inc to return NULL, failing to populate
`iter.seq`. At this point, due to the prior trace_iterator_reset, both
`iter.seq.len` and `iter.seq.size` were set to 0. Since they are equal,
the WARN_ON_ONCE condition is triggered.

Add a non-NULL check on the return value of trace_find_next_entry_inc
prior to invoking trace_printk_seq, ensuring the `iter.seq` is properly
populated before subsequent operations.

Fixes: d769041f8653 ("ring_buffer: implement new locking")
Signed-off-by: Tengda Wu <wutengda@...weicloud.com>
---
 kernel/trace/trace.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.c b/kernel/trace/trace.c
index 4283ed4e8f59..efd82e5f1e25 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
@@ -10632,10 +10632,10 @@ static void ftrace_dump_one(struct trace_array *tr, enum ftrace_dump_mode dump_m
 			ret = print_trace_line(&iter);
 			if (ret != TRACE_TYPE_NO_CONSUME)
 				trace_consume(&iter);
+
+			trace_printk_seq(&iter.seq);
 		}
 		touch_nmi_watchdog();
-
-		trace_printk_seq(&iter.seq);
 	}
 
 	if (!cnt)
-- 
2.34.1


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ