[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPVz0n24N1-iAoQFpzw7r7sz2E4Xhd8fB-gaoPesdc7XaR2HcQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2025 08:19:53 +0300
From: Svyatoslav Ryhel <clamor95@...il.com>
To: Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@...dia.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>, Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>, Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@...dia.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] ARM: tegra: Add DFLL clock support on Tegra 4
пт, 22 серп. 2025 р. о 06:05 Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@...dia.com> пише:
>
> On Friday, March 21, 2025 6:55 PM Svyatoslav Ryhel wrote:
> > Add DFLL clock node to common Tegra114 device tree along with clocks
> > property to cpu node.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Svyatoslav Ryhel <clamor95@...il.com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra114.dtsi | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra114.dtsi
> > b/arch/arm/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra114.dtsi index 341ec0962460..25d063a47ca5
> > 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra114.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra114.dtsi
> > @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
> > #include <dt-bindings/memory/tegra114-mc.h>
> > #include <dt-bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-tegra.h>
> > #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
> > +#include <dt-bindings/reset/tegra114-car.h>
> > #include <dt-bindings/soc/tegra-pmc.h>
> >
> > #include "tegra114-peripherals-opp.dtsi"
> > @@ -710,6 +711,30 @@ mipi: mipi@...e3000 {
> > #nvidia,mipi-calibrate-cells = <1>;
> > };
> >
> > + dfll: clock@...10000 {
> > + compatible = "nvidia,tegra114-dfll";
> > + reg = <0x70110000 0x100>, /* DFLL control */
> > + <0x70110000 0x100>, /* I2C output control */
> > + <0x70110100 0x100>, /* Integrated I2C controller */
> > + <0x70110200 0x100>; /* Look-up table RAM */
> > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 62 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > + clocks = <&tegra_car TEGRA114_CLK_DFLL_SOC>,
> > + <&tegra_car TEGRA114_CLK_DFLL_REF>,
> > + <&tegra_car TEGRA114_CLK_I2C5>;
> > + clock-names = "soc", "ref", "i2c";
> > + resets = <&tegra_car TEGRA114_RST_DFLL_DVCO>;
> > + reset-names = "dvco";
> > + #clock-cells = <0>;
> > + clock-output-names = "dfllCPU_out";
> > + nvidia,sample-rate = <11500>;
>
> Should this be 12500? That would match Tegra124 and a downstream kernel for
> Tegra114 I have.
>
I referred to tegratab and macallan boards in 3.4 kernel which give
11500, maybe sample-rate was changed to 12500 later with tegra124
addition?
> > + nvidia,droop-ctrl = <0x00000f00>;
> > + nvidia,force-mode = <1>;
> > + nvidia,cf = <10>;
> > + nvidia,ci = <0>;
> > + nvidia,cg = <2>;
> > + status = "disabled";
> > + };
> > +
> > mmc@...00000 {
> > compatible = "nvidia,tegra114-sdhci";
> > reg = <0x78000000 0x200>;
> > @@ -841,6 +866,15 @@ cpu@0 {
> > device_type = "cpu";
> > compatible = "arm,cortex-a15";
> > reg = <0>;
> > +
> > + clocks = <&tegra_car TEGRA114_CLK_CCLK_G>,
> > + <&tegra_car TEGRA114_CLK_CCLK_LP>,
> > + <&tegra_car TEGRA114_CLK_PLL_X>,
> > + <&tegra_car TEGRA114_CLK_PLL_P>,
> > + <&dfll>;
> > + clock-names = "cpu_g", "cpu_lp", "pll_x", "pll_p",
> "dfll";
> > + /* FIXME: what's the actual transition time? */
> > + clock-latency = <300000>;
> > };
> >
> > cpu@1 {
>
>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists