lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aKghV0FQDXa0qodb@strlen.de>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2025 09:50:58 +0200
From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
To: Wang Liang <wangliang74@...wei.com>
Cc: pablo@...filter.org, kadlec@...filter.org, razor@...ckwall.org,
	idosch@...dia.com, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
	kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, horms@...nel.org,
	yuehaibing@...wei.com, zhangchangzhong@...wei.com,
	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, coreteam@...filter.org,
	bridge@...ts.linux.dev, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] netfilter: br_netfilter: do not check confirmed
 bit in br_nf_local_in() after confirm

Wang Liang <wangliang74@...wei.com> wrote:
> When send a broadcast packet to a tap device, which was added to a bridge,
> br_nf_local_in() is called to confirm the conntrack. If another conntrack
> with the same hash value is added to the hash table, which can be
> triggered by a normal packet to a non-bridge device, the below warning
> may happen.

I placed this in nf.git:testing.

In case netdev maintainers want to take it directly:

Acked-by: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ