linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6.12 000/438] 6.12.43-rc2 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2025082231-upstairs-blinks-1f4e@gregkh>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2025 10:16:25 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
	lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
	f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
	srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org,
	hargar@...rosoft.com, broonie@...nel.org, achill@...ill.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.12 000/438] 6.12.43-rc2 review

On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 08:12:27AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2025 at 02:31:21PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.43 release.
> > There are 438 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Thu, 21 Aug 2025 12:27:16 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> 
> Build reference: v6.12.43
> Compiler version: arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc (GCC) 14.3.0
> Assembler version: GNU assembler (GNU Binutils) 2.44
> 
> Configuration file workarounds:
>     "s/CONFIG_FRAME_WARN=.*/CONFIG_FRAME_WARN=0/"
> 
> Building arm:allmodconfig ... failed
> --------------
> Error log:
> drivers/net/can/ti_hecc.c: In function 'ti_hecc_start':
> drivers/net/can/ti_hecc.c:386:21: error: implicit declaration of function 'BIT_U32'; did you mean 'BIT_ULL'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
>   386 |         mbx_mask = ~BIT_U32(HECC_RX_LAST_MBOX);
>       |                     ^~~~~~~
>       |                     BIT_ULL
> 
> There is no BIT_U32 in v6.12.y. The same build error is seen in v6.15.11,
> which is also missing the definition of BIT_U32. Odd that no one seems
> to have noticed this. Am I missing something ?

I'm now seeing this as well.  I'm guessing no one else does arm32 full
builds anymore?  I guess no one cares about that platform anymore :(

I'll go revert the offending commit, thanks for letting me know.

greg k-h