[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4469d2cd-5927-4344-acb0-bc7d35925bb1@lunn.ch>
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2025 17:00:17 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Jonas Gorski <jonas.gorski@...il.com>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: dsa: b53: fix ageing time for BCM53101
On Sat, Aug 23, 2025 at 11:06:16AM +0200, Jonas Gorski wrote:
> For some reason Broadcom decided that BCM53101 uses 0.5s increments for
> the ageing time register, but kept the field width the same [1]. Due to
> this, the actual ageing time was always half of what was configured.
>
> Fix this by adapting the limits and value calculation for BCM53101.
>
> [1] https://github.com/Broadcom-Network-Switching-Software/OpenMDK/blob/master/cdk/PKG/chip/bcm53101/bcm53101_a0_defs.h#L28966
Is line 28966 correct? In order to find a reference to age, i needed
to search further in the file.
Are these devices organised in families/generations. Are you sure this
does not apply to:
BCM53101_DEVICE_ID = 0x53101,
BCM53115_DEVICE_ID = 0x53115,
BCM53125_DEVICE_ID = 0x53125,
BCM53128_DEVICE_ID = 0x53128,
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists