[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87ldnavsse.ffs@tglx>
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2025 19:42:25 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Sumanth Gavini
<sumanth.gavini@...oo.com>
Cc: rostedt@...dmis.org, mhiramat@...nel.org, jstultz@...gle.com,
clingutla@...eaurora.org, mingo@...nel.org, sashal@...nel.org,
boqun.feng@...il.com, ryotkkr98@...il.com, kprateek.nayak@....com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org, "J . Avila"
<elavila@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1] softirq: Add trace points for tasklet entry/exit
On Fri, Aug 22 2025 at 15:07, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2025 at 11:17:54AM -0500, Sumanth Gavini wrote:
>
> And I'm with John, this makes no sense as to why you need/want these. I
> think that the syzbot report is bogus, sorry. Please prove me wrong :)
It was validated by AI (Absense of Intelligence) that adding tracepoints
makes the problem go away! So why do you want extra proof?
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists