linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] time: introduce BOOT_TIME

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87y0r93a5q.ffs@tglx>
Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2025 01:12:17 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: vishnu singh <v-singh1@...com>, mark.rutland@....com, maz@...nel.org,
 catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org, jstultz@...gle.com,
 sboyd@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, chenhuacai@...nel.org,
 pmladek@...e.com, agordeev@...ux.ibm.com, bigeasy@...utronix.de,
 urezki@...il.com, Llillian@...r-ark.net, francesco@...la.it,
 guoweikang.kernel@...il.com, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
 rrangel@...omium.org, kpsingh@...nel.org, anna-maria@...utronix.de,
 mingo@...nel.org, frederic@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] time: introduce BOOT_TIME_TRACKER and minimal boot
 timestamp

On Sun, Aug 24 2025 at 00:53, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> So the [0.000008] timestamp happens exactly 1.0 seconds after power
> on.

Let me correct myself it's exactly: 1.000008 seconds after power on

Sorry for this fundamental mistake.

Thanks,

        tglx