[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aKrgDVaynJxnmR9r@xhacker>
Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2025 17:49:01 +0800
From: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/14] dt-bindings: dma: dma350: Document interrupt-names
On Sat, Aug 23, 2025 at 06:09:22PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 23/08/2025 17:40, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> > Currently, the dma350 driver assumes all channels are available to
> > linux, this may not be true on some platforms, so it's possible no
> > irq(s) for the unavailable channel(s). What's more, the available
> > channels may not be continuous. To handle this case, we'd better
> > get the irq of each channel by name.
>
> You did not solve the actual problem - binding still lists the
> interrupts in specific order.
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>
> > ---
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/arm,dma-350.yaml | 5 +++++
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/arm,dma-350.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/arm,dma-350.yaml
> > index 429f682f15d8..94752516e51a 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/arm,dma-350.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/arm,dma-350.yaml
> > @@ -32,6 +32,10 @@ properties:
> > - description: Channel 6 interrupt
> > - description: Channel 7 interrupt
> >
> > + interrupt-names:
> > + minItems: 1
> > + maxItems: 8
>
> You need to list the items.
I found in current dt-bindings, not all doc list the items. So is it
changed now?
>
>
> > +
> > "#dma-cells":
> > const: 1
> > description: The cell is the trigger input number
> > @@ -40,5 +44,6 @@ required:
> > - compatible
> > - reg
> > - interrupts
> > + - interrupt-names
>
> That's ABI break, so no.
If there's no users of arm-dma350 in upstream so far, is ABI break
allowed? The reason is simple: to simplify the driver to parse
the irq.
Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists