linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RESEND v2 4/4] spi: spi-airoha-snfi: return an error for continuous mode dirmap creation cases

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87o6s4k9b3.fsf@bootlin.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2025 17:50:56 +0200
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
To: Mikhail Kshevetskiy <mikhail.kshevetskiy@...sys.eu>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,  Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
  Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,  Lorenzo Bianconi
 <lorenzo@...nel.org>,  Ray Liu <ray.liu@...oha.com>,  Tudor Ambarus
 <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>,  Martin Kurbanov
 <mmkurbanov@...utedevices.com>,  Takahiro Kuwano
 <Takahiro.Kuwano@...ineon.com>,  Cheng Ming Lin
 <chengminglin@...c.com.tw>,  linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
  linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,  linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
  linux-spi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v2 4/4] spi: spi-airoha-snfi: return an error for
 continuous mode dirmap creation cases

On 14/08/2025 at 18:33:25 +03, Mikhail Kshevetskiy <mikhail.kshevetskiy@...sys.eu> wrote:

> On 14.08.2025 18:29, Mark Brown wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 14, 2025 at 09:54:23AM +0300, Mikhail Kshevetskiy wrote:
>>> This driver can accelerate single page operations only, thus
>>> continuous reading mode should not be used.
>>>
>>> Continuous reading will use sizes up to the size of one erase block.
>>> This size is much larger than the size of single flash page. Use this
>>> difference to identify continuous reading and return an error.
>> This seems like it just applies anyway regardless of the rest of the
>> series?
>
> Could you provide a link? I do not see this in upstream linux repo.

No link, Mark can apply this without the rest of the series it seems. If
that's the case, it's best to send two series because these patches
apply to different trees.

Thanks,
Miquèl