[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250825144926.GVaKx39npwZZ18htgX@fat_crate.local>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2025 16:49:26 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: "Upadhyay, Neeraj" <neeraj.upadhyay@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, Thomas.Lendacky@....com,
nikunj@....com, Santosh.Shukla@....com, Vasant.Hegde@....com,
Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com, David.Kaplan@....com, x86@...nel.org,
hpa@...or.com, peterz@...radead.org, seanjc@...gle.com,
pbonzini@...hat.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com, huibo.wang@....com,
naveen.rao@....com, francescolavra.fl@...il.com,
tiala@...rosoft.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 05/18] x86/apic: Add update_vector() callback for apic
drivers
On Wed, Aug 20, 2025 at 09:06:52AM +0530, Upadhyay, Neeraj wrote:
> > > +static void apic_chipd_update_vector(struct irq_data *irqd, unsigned int newvec,
> >
> > What is "chipd" supposed to denote?
>
> chip data (struct apic_chip_data)
So this function should be called chip_data_update() or so?
It is static so it doesn't need the "apic_" prefix and "chipd" doesn't make
a whole lotta of sense so let's call it as what it does.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists