linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] media: ov8865: move mode_configure out of state

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAEs41JCZ0ab_HVZ=NiZbC_52pc+yhXcgOBECDN7sy8DsaBD6rA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2025 08:08:09 -0700
From: Allen Ballway <ballway@...omium.org>
To: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>, Hans de Goede <hansg@...nel.org>, 
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>, linux-media@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: ov8865: move mode_configure out of state_configure

Hi Sakari,

I sent out a v2 some time ago
(https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250723-mode_configure-v2-1-7fb0f6ba1194@chromium.org).
It seems I used b4 incorrectly and it didn't add to this chain as I
expected, apologies for the confusion.

Thanks,
Allen

On Mon, Aug 25, 2025 at 12:55 AM Sakari Ailus
<sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Allen, Laurent,
>
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2025 at 08:02:37PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 23, 2025 at 09:40:42AM -0700, Allen Ballway wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 23, 2025 at 8:47 AM Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 01:35:43PM -0700, Allen Ballway wrote:
> > > > > ov8865_mode_configure() only needs to be called on sensor init, but it can
> > > > > be called multiple times from ov8865_state_configure(). Move
> > > > > ov8865_mode_configure() to ov8865_sensor_init().
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Allen Ballway <ballway@...omium.org>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >  drivers/media/i2c/ov8865.c | 15 +++++++--------
> > > > >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/ov8865.c b/drivers/media/i2c/ov8865.c
> > > > > index 95ffe7536aa6aba814f4e5c3d12e7279470b2f07..1d1a1f261bf4ab5c09848402dc057e2f572504e7 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/media/i2c/ov8865.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/ov8865.c
> > > > > @@ -2304,14 +2304,6 @@ static int ov8865_state_configure(struct ov8865_sensor *sensor,
> > > > >       if (sensor->state.streaming)
> > > > >               return -EBUSY;
> > > > >
> > > > > -     /* State will be configured at first power on otherwise. */
> > > > > -     if (pm_runtime_enabled(sensor->dev) &&
> > > > > -         !pm_runtime_suspended(sensor->dev)) {
> > > > > -             ret = ov8865_mode_configure(sensor, mode, mbus_code);
> > > > > -             if (ret)
> > > > > -                     return ret;
> > > > > -     }
> > > > > -
> > > > >       ret = ov8865_state_mipi_configure(sensor, mode, mbus_code);
> > > > >       if (ret)
> > > > >               return ret;
> > > > > @@ -2384,6 +2376,13 @@ static int ov8865_sensor_init(struct ov8865_sensor *sensor)
> > > > >       }
> > > > >
> > > > >       /* Configure current mode. */
> > > > > +     ret = ov8865_mode_configure(sensor, sensor->state.mode,
> > > > > +                                  sensor->state.mbus_code);
> > > >
> > > > How about the implication on ov8865_set_fmt() that will not update the
> > > > link freq and pixel rate controls anymore ?
> > >
> > > I believe those will be unaffected by this change, they are updated in
> > > ov8865_state_mipi_configure() which is still called from
> > > ov8865_set_fmt() via ov8865_state_configure().
> >
> > You're right, my bad.
> >
> > > > > +     if (ret) {
> > > > > +             dev_err(sensor->dev, "failed to configure mode\n");
> > > > > +             return ret;
> > > > > +     }
> > > > > +
> > > > >       ret = ov8865_state_configure(sensor, sensor->state.mode,
> > > > >                                    sensor->state.mbus_code);
> >
> > Can't we drop this now ? The remaining code in ov8865_state_configure()
> > updates the link frequency and pixel rate controls, and sets
> > sensor->state.mode and sensor->state.mbus_code. The latter is a no-op
> > here as they're set to their current value, and the controls shouldn't
> > need an update in this function as it's only called from
> > ov8865_resume().
>
> Any comments on this? Will there be v2?
>
> --
> Sakari Ailus