lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOQ4uxjexmFyfGuzuVsCmheqM_2drVsLUm3Fifv1we5u39WveA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2025 17:32:06 +0200
From: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>
To: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <gabriel@...sman.be>
Cc: André Almeida <andrealmeid@...lia.com>, 
	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>, Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, linux-unionfs@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, 
	Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, 
	kernel-dev@...lia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 5/9] ovl: Ensure that all layers have the same encoding

On Mon, Aug 25, 2025 at 1:17 PM Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
<gabriel@...sman.be> wrote:
>
> André Almeida <andrealmeid@...lia.com> writes:
>
> > When merging layers from different filesystems with casefold enabled,
> > all layers should use the same encoding version and have the same flags
> > to avoid any kind of incompatibility issues.
> >
> > Also, set the encoding and the encoding flags for the ovl super block as
> > the same as used by the first valid layer.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>
> > Signed-off-by: André Almeida <andrealmeid@...lia.com>
> > ---
> >  fs/overlayfs/super.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/overlayfs/super.c b/fs/overlayfs/super.c
> > index df85a76597e910d00323018f1d2cd720c5db921d..b1dbd3c79961094d00c7f99cc622e515d544d22f 100644
> > --- a/fs/overlayfs/super.c
> > +++ b/fs/overlayfs/super.c
> > @@ -991,6 +991,18 @@ static int ovl_get_data_fsid(struct ovl_fs *ofs)
> >       return ofs->numfs;
> >  }
> >
> > +/*
> > + * Set the ovl sb encoding as the same one used by the first layer
> > + */
> > +static void ovl_set_encoding(struct super_block *sb, struct super_block *fs_sb)
> > +{
> > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_UNICODE)
> > +     if (sb_has_encoding(fs_sb)) {
> > +             sb->s_encoding = fs_sb->s_encoding;
> > +             sb->s_encoding_flags = fs_sb->s_encoding_flags;
> > +     }
> > +#endif
> > +}
> >
> >  static int ovl_get_layers(struct super_block *sb, struct ovl_fs *ofs,
> >                         struct ovl_fs_context *ctx, struct ovl_layer *layers)
> > @@ -1024,6 +1036,9 @@ static int ovl_get_layers(struct super_block *sb, struct ovl_fs *ofs,
> >       if (ovl_upper_mnt(ofs)) {
> >               ofs->fs[0].sb = ovl_upper_mnt(ofs)->mnt_sb;
> >               ofs->fs[0].is_lower = false;
> > +
> > +             if (ofs->casefold)
> > +                     ovl_set_encoding(sb, ofs->fs[0].sb);
> >       }
> >
> >       nr_merged_lower = ctx->nr - ctx->nr_data;
> > @@ -1083,6 +1098,16 @@ static int ovl_get_layers(struct super_block *sb, struct ovl_fs *ofs,
> >               l->name = NULL;
> >               ofs->numlayer++;
> >               ofs->fs[fsid].is_lower = true;
> > +
> > +             if (ofs->casefold) {
> > +                     if (!ovl_upper_mnt(ofs) && !sb_has_encoding(sb))
> > +                             ovl_set_encoding(sb, ofs->fs[fsid].sb);
> > +
> > +                     if (!sb_has_encoding(sb) || !sb_same_encoding(sb, mnt->mnt_sb)) {
>
> Minor nit, but isn't the sb_has_encoding()  check redundant here?  sb_same_encoding
> will check the sb->encoding matches the mnt_sb already.

Maybe we did something wrong but the intention was:
If all layers root are casefold disabled (or not supported) then
a mix of layers with fs of different encoding (and fs with no encoding support)
is allowed because we take care that all directories are always
casefold disabled.

Thanks,
Amir.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ