linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] ASoC: amd: acp: Remove (explicitly) unused header

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aKyFDaYnXrC5sMiA@finisterre.sirena.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2025 16:45:17 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-sound@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] ASoC: amd: acp: Remove (explicitly) unused header

On Mon, Aug 25, 2025 at 04:55:53PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 10:09:43AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > The fwnode.h is not supposed to be used by the drivers as it
> > has the definitions for the core parts for different device
> > property provider implementations. Drop it.
> > 
> > Note, that fwnode API for drivers is provided in property.h
> > which is included here.
> 
> Any news here?

Please don't send content free pings and please allow a reasonable time
for review.  People get busy, go on holiday, attend conferences and so 
on so unless there is some reason for urgency (like critical bug fixes)
please allow at least a couple of weeks for review.  If there have been
review comments then people may be waiting for those to be addressed.

Sending content free pings adds to the mail volume (if they are seen at
all) which is often the problem and since they can't be reviewed
directly if something has gone wrong you'll have to resend the patches
anyway, so sending again is generally a better approach though there are
some other maintainers who like them - if in doubt look at how patches
for the subsystem are normally handled.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)