lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250825170531.GA1899851@ziepe.ca>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2025 14:05:31 -0300
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
To: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@...labora.com>
Cc: joro@...tes.org, will@...nel.org, robin.murphy@....com, robh@...nel.org,
	krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, heiko@...ech.de,
	nicolas.dufresne@...labora.com, p.zabel@...gutronix.de,
	mchehab@...nel.org, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, kernel@...labora.com,
	linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 4/6] media: verisilicon: AV1: Restore IOMMU context
 before decoding a frame

On Mon, Aug 25, 2025 at 05:34:43PM +0200, Benjamin Gaignard wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/verisilicon/hantro.h b/drivers/media/platform/verisilicon/hantro.h
> index 81328c63b796..a28a181013b9 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/verisilicon/hantro.h
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/verisilicon/hantro.h
> @@ -12,6 +12,9 @@
>  #ifndef HANTRO_H_
>  #define HANTRO_H_
>  
> +#include <linux/dma-map-ops.h>
> +#include <linux/iommu.h>
> +#include <linux/iommu-dma.h>

This is an internal header it should not be included in drivers.

> +static void rockchip_vpu981_av1_restore_iommu(struct hantro_ctx *ctx)
> +{
> +	if (ctx->iommu_domain) {
> +		iommu_attach_device(ctx->iommu_domain, ctx->dev->v4l2_dev.dev);
> +		iommu_detach_device(ctx->iommu_domain, ctx->dev->v4l2_dev.dev);
> +	}
> +}

What is this supposed to do? Put it back to the default domain? Who
changed it away from the default domain?

Did some other driver change the attached domain (if so that's wild
and wrong)? The commit message hints at that but it should be
explained alot more.

This just seems wrong and goofy. Driver shouldn't be changing their
iommu domains if they are using the default domain at all. We now have
APIs to allow you to allocate wide chunks of IOVA space and manage
them directly. Maybe these 'multiple stream's should be doing that
instead of mucking with iommu domains?

Jason

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ