[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aKzBQRKuEmrNtCiB@google.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2025 13:02:09 -0700
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>,
Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>, x86@...nel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>, Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>, Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>
Subject: Re: [patch V2 36/37] rseq: Switch to TIF_RSEQ if supported
On Sat, Aug 23, 2025, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> @@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ static inline void rseq_force_update(voi
> */
> static inline void rseq_virt_userspace_exit(void)
> {
> - if (current->rseq_event.sched_switch)
> + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAVE_GENERIC_TIF_BITS) && current->rseq_event.sched_switch)
Rather than pivot on CONFIG_HAVE_GENERIC_TIF_BITS, which makes the "why" quite
difficult to find/understand, what if this checks TIF_RSEQ == TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME?
That would also allow architectures to define TIF_RSEQ without switching to the
generic TIF bits implementation (though I don't know that we want to encourage
that?).
Updating the comment to explain what's going on would also be helpful, e.g.
diff --git a/include/linux/rseq.h b/include/linux/rseq.h
index 185a4875b261..9a8e238ae9d1 100644
--- a/include/linux/rseq.h
+++ b/include/linux/rseq.h
@@ -112,17 +112,17 @@ static inline void rseq_force_update(void)
/*
* KVM/HYPERV invoke resume_user_mode_work() before entering guest mode,
- * which clears TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME. To avoid updating user space RSEQ in
- * that case just to do it eventually again before returning to user space,
- * the entry resume_user_mode_work() invocation is ignored as the register
- * argument is NULL.
+ * which clears TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME on architectures that don't provide a separate
+ * TIF_RSEQ flag. To avoid updating user space RSEQ in that case just to do it
+ * eventually again before returning to user space, __rseq_handle_slowpath()
+ * does nothing when invoked with NULL register state.
*
- * After returning from guest mode, they have to invoke this function to
- * re-raise TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME if necessary.
+ * After returning from guest mode, before exiting to userspace, hypervisors
+ * must invoke this function to re-raise TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME if necessary.
*/
static inline void rseq_virt_userspace_exit(void)
{
- if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAVE_GENERIC_TIF_BITS) && current->rseq_event.sched_switch)
+ if (TIF_RSEQ == TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME && current->rseq_event.sched_switch)
rseq_raise_notify_resume(current);
}
> rseq_raise_notify_resume(current);
> }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists