[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250825203223.629515-1-jarkko@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2025 23:32:23 +0300
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
To: linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.or,
Chris Fenner <cfenn@...gle.com>,
Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org (open list),
keyrings@...r.kernel.org (open list:KEYS/KEYRINGS),
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org (open list:SECURITY SUBSYSTEM)
Subject: [PATCH] tpm: Disable TPM2_TCG_HMAC by default
After reading all the feedback, right now disabling the TPM2_TCG_HMAC
is the right call.
Other views discussed:
A. Having a kernel command-line parameter or refining the feature
otherwise. This goes to the area of improvements. E.g., one
example is my own idea where the null key specific code would be
replaced with a persistent handle parameter (which can be
*unambigously* defined as part of attestation process when
done correctly).
B. Removing the code. I don't buy this because that is same as saying
that HMAC encryption cannot work at all (if really nitpicking) in
any form. Also I disagree on the view that the feature could not
be refined to something more reasoable.
Also, both A and B are worst options in terms of backporting.
Thuss, this is the best possible choice.
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.or # v6.10+
Fixes: d2add27cf2b8 ("tpm: Add NULL primary creation")
Suggested-by: Chris Fenner <cfenn@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
---
PS. I did not post this last week because that would have been most
likely the most counter-productive action to taken. It's better
sometimes to take a bit of time to think (which can be seen that
I've given also more reasonable weight to my own eaerlier
proposals).
I also accept further changes, if there is e.g., inconsistency
with TCG_TPM_HMAC setting or similar (obviously).
---
drivers/char/tpm/Kconfig | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/Kconfig b/drivers/char/tpm/Kconfig
index dddd702b2454..3e4684f6b4af 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/Kconfig
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ if TCG_TPM
config TCG_TPM2_HMAC
bool "Use HMAC and encrypted transactions on the TPM bus"
- default X86_64
+ default n
select CRYPTO_ECDH
select CRYPTO_LIB_AESCFB
select CRYPTO_LIB_SHA256
--
2.39.5
Powered by blists - more mailing lists