linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the kunit-next tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250825160557.591ef4d7@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2025 16:05:57 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>, Marie Zhussupova <marievic@...gle.com>,
 Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, KUnit Development
 <kunit-dev@...glegroups.com>, Linux Next Mailing List
 <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the kunit-next tree

Hi all,

On Tue, 19 Aug 2025 15:44:52 +0800 David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 19 Aug 2025 at 00:32, Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > On 8/17/25 20:08, Stephen Rothwell wrote:  
> > >
> > > After merging the kunit-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > > allmodconfig) failed like this:  
> >
> > Thank you Stephen. I did a allmodconfig build on 6.17-rc1 base - didn't
> > see the error.
> >
> > Marie, David, can you take a look this. Looks like conflict with drm
> > in next?
> 
> Thanks, Shuah. I've managed to reproduce this with:
> ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch x86_64 --kunitconfig
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe
> 
> These patches fix it (and a corresponding drm/xe test failure):
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-next/20250819073434.1411114-1-davidgow@google.com/T/#t
> 
> Ideally, they'll be squashed into the corresponding patches, as
> otherwise there'd be some temporary breakage during bisections. I can
> squash these into the original series and re-send it out if that works
> best for you.
> 
> Cheers,
> -- David
> 
> > >
> > > In file included from include/kunit/static_stub.h:18,
> > >                   from drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c:20:
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_bo.c:610:48: error: initialization of 'const void * (*)(struct kunit *, const void *, char *)' from incompatible pointer type 'const void * (*)(const void *, char *)' [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
> > >    610 |         KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(xe_ccs_migrate_kunit, xe_pci_live_device_gen_param),
> > >        |                                                ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > include/kunit/test.h:210:38: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_CASE_PARAM'
> > >    210 |                   .generate_params = gen_params, .module_name = KBUILD_MODNAME}
> > >        |                                      ^~~~~~~~~~
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_bo.c:610:48: note: (near initialization for 'xe_bo_tests[0].generate_params')
> > >    610 |         KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(xe_ccs_migrate_kunit, xe_pci_live_device_gen_param),
> > >        |                                                ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > include/kunit/test.h:210:38: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_CASE_PARAM'
> > >    210 |                   .generate_params = gen_params, .module_name = KBUILD_MODNAME}
> > >        |                                      ^~~~~~~~~~
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_bo.c:611:45: error: initialization of 'const void * (*)(struct kunit *, const void *, char *)' from incompatible pointer type 'const void * (*)(const void *, char *)' [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
> > >    611 |         KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(xe_bo_evict_kunit, xe_pci_live_device_gen_param),
> > >        |                                             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > include/kunit/test.h:210:38: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_CASE_PARAM'
> > >    210 |                   .generate_params = gen_params, .module_name = KBUILD_MODNAME}
> > >        |                                      ^~~~~~~~~~
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_bo.c:611:45: note: (near initialization for 'xe_bo_tests[1].generate_params')
> > >    611 |         KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(xe_bo_evict_kunit, xe_pci_live_device_gen_param),
> > >        |                                             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > include/kunit/test.h:210:38: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_CASE_PARAM'
> > >    210 |                   .generate_params = gen_params, .module_name = KBUILD_MODNAME}
> > >        |                                      ^~~~~~~~~~
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_bo.c:624:51: error: initialization of 'const void * (*)(struct kunit *, const void *, char *)' from incompatible pointer type 'const void * (*)(const void *, char *)' [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
> > >    624 |         KUNIT_CASE_PARAM_ATTR(xe_bo_shrink_kunit, xe_pci_live_device_gen_param,
> > >        |                                                   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > include/kunit/test.h:223:38: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_CASE_PARAM_ATTR'
> > >    223 |                   .generate_params = gen_params,                                \
> > >        |                                      ^~~~~~~~~~
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_bo.c:624:51: note: (near initialization for 'xe_bo_shrink_test[0].generate_params')
> > >    624 |         KUNIT_CASE_PARAM_ATTR(xe_bo_shrink_kunit, xe_pci_live_device_gen_param,
> > >        |                                                   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > include/kunit/test.h:223:38: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_CASE_PARAM_ATTR'
> > >    223 |                   .generate_params = gen_params,                                \
> > >        |                                      ^~~~~~~~~~
> > >
> > > Caused by commit
> > >
> > >    444be9072fca ("kunit: Pass parameterized test context to generate_params()")
> > >
> > > I have used the kunit-next tree from next-20250815 for today.

I am still seeing this build failure.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped