[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250825075732.10694-4-kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2025 07:57:31 +0000
From: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@....com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
<x86@...nel.org>
CC: Naveen rao <naveen.rao@....com>, Sairaj Kodilkar <sarunkod@....com>, "H.
Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)"
<peterz@...radead.org>, "Xin Li (Intel)" <xin@...or.com>, Pawan Gupta
<pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>, Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, Mario Limonciello
<mario.limonciello@....com>, "Gautham R. Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@....com>,
Babu Moger <babu.moger@....com>, Suravee Suthikulpanit
<suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>, K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@....com>,
Naveen N Rao <naveen@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v4 3/4] x86/cpu/topology: Check for X86_FEATURE_XTOPOLOGY instead of passing has_topoext
cpu_parse_topology_ext() sets X86_FEATURE_XTOPOLOGY before returning
true if any of the XTOPOLOGY leaf (0x80000026 / 0xb) could be parsed
successfully.
Instead of storing and passing around this return value using
"has_topoext" in parse_topology_amd(), check for X86_FEATURE_XTOPOLOGY
instead in parse_8000_001e() to simplify the flow.
No functional changes intended.
Signed-off-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@....com>
---
Changelog v3..v4:
o Moved this to Patch 3. No changes to diff.
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/topology_amd.c | 16 +++++++---------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/topology_amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/topology_amd.c
index 4e3134a5550c..12ece07b407b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/topology_amd.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/topology_amd.c
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ static void store_node(struct topo_scan *tscan, u16 nr_nodes, u16 node_id)
tscan->amd_node_id = node_id;
}
-static bool parse_8000_001e(struct topo_scan *tscan, bool has_topoext)
+static bool parse_8000_001e(struct topo_scan *tscan)
{
struct {
// eax
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ static bool parse_8000_001e(struct topo_scan *tscan, bool has_topoext)
* If leaf 0xb/0x26 is available, then the APIC ID and the domain
* shifts are set already.
*/
- if (!has_topoext) {
+ if (!cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_XTOPOLOGY)) {
tscan->c->topo.initial_apicid = leaf.ext_apic_id;
/*
@@ -175,6 +175,9 @@ static void topoext_fixup(struct topo_scan *tscan)
static void parse_topology_amd(struct topo_scan *tscan)
{
+ if (cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_AMD_HTR_CORES))
+ tscan->c->topo.cpu_type = cpuid_ebx(0x80000026);
+
/*
* Try to get SMT, CORE, TILE, and DIE shifts from extended
* CPUID leaf 0x8000_0026 on supported processors first. If
@@ -182,16 +185,11 @@ static void parse_topology_amd(struct topo_scan *tscan)
* get SMT and CORE shift from leaf 0xb first, then try to
* get the CORE shift from leaf 0x8000_0008.
*/
- bool has_topoext = cpu_parse_topology_ext(tscan);
-
- if (cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_AMD_HTR_CORES))
- tscan->c->topo.cpu_type = cpuid_ebx(0x80000026);
-
- if (!has_topoext && !parse_8000_0008(tscan))
+ if (!cpu_parse_topology_ext(tscan) && !parse_8000_0008(tscan))
return;
/* Prefer leaf 0x8000001e if available */
- if (parse_8000_001e(tscan, has_topoext))
+ if (parse_8000_001e(tscan))
return;
/* Try the NODEID MSR */
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists