[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4ae827e8-646a-4070-b06e-23bcd261ffcd@quicinc.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2025 16:35:58 +0800
From: Haixu Cui <quic_haixcui@...cinc.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
CC: <harald.mommer@....qualcomm.com>, <quic_msavaliy@...cinc.com>,
<broonie@...nel.org>, <virtio-dev@...ts.linux.dev>,
<viresh.kumar@...aro.org>, <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <hdanton@...a.com>,
<qiang4.zhang@...ux.intel.com>, <alex.bennee@...aro.org>,
<quic_ztu@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] virtio-spi: Add virtio-spi.h
On 8/20/2025 10:22 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2025 at 04:49:43PM +0800, Haixu Cui wrote:
>> Add virtio-spi.h header for virtio SPI.
>
> ...
>
>> +/**
>
> This is kernel-doc comment...
>
>> + * struct virtio_spi_config - All config fields are read-only for the
>> + * Virtio SPI driver
>
>> + */
>
> ...
>
>> +/*
>> + * @chip_select_id: chipselect index the SPI transfer used.
>> + *
>
> But this one (besides having tons of unneeded blank lines) is not. Why is this
> inconsistency?
>
>> + */
>
Thank you for pointing out the inconsistency. I will update the comment
to follow the kernel-doc format and remove the unnecessary blank lines.
This change will be reflected in the next patch version.
> ...
>
>> +struct spi_transfer_result {
>> +#define VIRTIO_SPI_TRANS_OK 0
>> +#define VIRTIO_SPI_PARAM_ERR 1
>> +#define VIRTIO_SPI_TRANS_ERR 2
>> + __u8 result;
>> +};
>
> And this data type has no doc at all...
>
Okay, will add definition for spi_tranafer_result.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists