[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aKw-yTq3jMeku5yG@localhost>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2025 12:45:29 +0200
From: Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@...hat.com>
To: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@...utronix.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jstultz@...gle.com
Subject: Re: CLOCK_AUX stepping
On Mon, Aug 25, 2025 at 12:22:34PM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> For high offsets we are stuck looping in __iter_div_u64().
> As far as I know, doing regular divisions in the timekeeping hot patch are
> problematic on some architectures, so instead of storing the offset as a
> single ktime_t, we might need to switch to 'struct timespec64' and do the
> division on clock adjustments.
>
> Can you try the following patch for now?
The patch fixes the problem for me. Thanks.
> diff --git a/kernel/time/vsyscall.c b/kernel/time/vsyscall.c
> index 8ba8b0d8a387..8190e9dc6569 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/vsyscall.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/vsyscall.c
> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
> */
>
> #include <linux/hrtimer.h>
> +#include <linux/math64.h>
> #include <linux/timekeeper_internal.h>
> #include <vdso/datapage.h>
> #include <vdso/helpers.h>
> @@ -143,6 +144,7 @@ void vdso_time_update_aux(struct timekeeper *tk)
> struct vdso_timestamp *vdso_ts;
> struct vdso_clock *vc;
> s32 clock_mode;
> + u32 nsec32;
> u64 nsec;
>
> vc = &vdata->aux_clock_data[tk->id - TIMEKEEPER_AUX_FIRST];
> @@ -163,7 +165,8 @@ void vdso_time_update_aux(struct timekeeper *tk)
>
> nsec = tk->tkr_mono.xtime_nsec >> tk->tkr_mono.shift;
> nsec += tk->offs_aux;
> - vdso_ts->sec += __iter_div_u64_rem(nsec, NSEC_PER_SEC, &nsec);
> + vdso_ts->sec += div_u64_rem(nsec, NSEC_PER_SEC, &nsec32);
> + nsec = nsec32;
> nsec = nsec << tk->tkr_mono.shift;
> vdso_ts->nsec = nsec;
> }
>
>
>
> Thomas
>
--
Miroslav Lichvar
Powered by blists - more mailing lists