[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aKxfGix_o4glz8-Z@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2025 14:03:22 +0100
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>,
Alexander Aring <alex.aring@...il.com>,
Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@...har.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] uapi/fcntl: conditionally define AT_RENAME* macros
On Sun, Aug 24, 2025 at 04:54:50PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> In file included from ../samples/vfs/test-statx.c:23:
> usr/include/linux/fcntl.h:159:9: warning: ‘AT_RENAME_NOREPLACE’ redefined
> 159 | #define AT_RENAME_NOREPLACE 0x0001
> In file included from ../samples/vfs/test-statx.c:13:
> /usr/include/stdio.h:171:10: note: this is the location of the previous definition
> 171 | # define AT_RENAME_NOREPLACE RENAME_NOREPLACE
Oh dear. This is going to be libc-version-dependent.
$ grep -r AT_RENAME_NOREPLACE /usr/include
/usr/include/linux/fcntl.h:#define AT_RENAME_NOREPLACE 0x0001
It's not in stdio.h at all. This is with libc6 2.41-10
Powered by blists - more mailing lists