linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] ASoC: amd: acp: Remove (explicitly) unused header

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aK22Ik8KDFcKwCjc@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2025 16:26:58 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-sound@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] ASoC: amd: acp: Remove (explicitly) unused header

On Mon, Aug 25, 2025 at 09:13:20PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 25, 2025 at 07:01:36PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 25, 2025 at 04:45:17PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> 
> > > all) which is often the problem and since they can't be reviewed
> > > directly if something has gone wrong you'll have to resend the patches
> > > anyway, so sending again is generally a better approach though there are
> > > some other maintainers who like them - if in doubt look at how patches
> > > for the subsystem are normally handled.
> 
> > I truly believe the 5 month is reasonable time for review, no?
> 
> You're missing the part about how you should resend instead.

Noted, thanks! 

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko