[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2a5bd51a-869b-406c-9ff6-5c9799fdd4c6@lucifer.local>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2025 14:59:28 +0100
From: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>, Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Andreas Larsson <andreas@...sler.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>, Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
"Liam R . Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
Nico Pache <npache@...hat.com>, Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>,
Dev Jain <dev.jain@....com>, Barry Song <baohua@...nel.org>,
Xu Xin <xu.xin16@....com.cn>,
Chengming Zhou <chengming.zhou@...ux.dev>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@...ux.dev>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>, John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@...e.de>, Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@...il.com>, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/10] mm: correct sign-extension issue in MMF_* flag
masks
On Tue, Aug 26, 2025 at 03:05:27PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 12.08.25 17:44, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> > There is an issue with the mask declarations in linux/mm_types.h, which
> > naively do (1 << bit) operations. Unfortunately this results in the 1 being
> > defaulted as a signed (32-bit) integer.
> >
> > When the compiler expands the MMF_INIT_MASK bitmask it comes up with:
> >
> > (((1 << 2) - 1) | (((1 << 9) - 1) << 2) | (1 << 24) | (1 << 28) | (1 << 30)
> > | (1 << 31))
> >
> > Which overflows the signed integer to -788,527,105. Implicitly casting this
> > to an unsigned integer results in sign-expansion, and thus this value
> > becomes 0xffffffffd10007ff, rather than the intended 0xd10007ff.
> >
> > While we're limited to a maximum of 32 bits in mm->flags, this isn't an
> > issue as the remaining bits being masked will always be zero.
> >
> > However, now we are moving towards having more bits in this flag, this
> > becomes an issue.
> >
> > Simply resolve this by using the _BITUL() helper to cast the shifted value
> > to an unsigned long.
>
> Hmm, I thought BIT() should be used and would just fine?
Sure.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists