linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6.16 000/457] 6.16.4-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <fcbab36e-5812-4bbc-8080-4e48e35930e7@hardfalcon.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2025 17:12:54 +0200
From: Pascal Ernster <git@...dfalcon.net>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: patches@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
 linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
 lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
 f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net,
 rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org, hargar@...rosoft.com, broonie@...nel.org,
 achill@...ill.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.16 000/457] 6.16.4-rc1 review

[2025-08-26 17:10] Pascal Ernster:
> [2025-08-26 13:04] Greg Kroah-Hartman:
>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.16.4 release.
>> There are 457 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>> let me know.
>>
>> Responses should be made by Thu, 28 Aug 2025 11:08:27 +0000.
>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>
>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.16.4-rc1.gz
>> or in the git tree and branch at:
>> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.16.y
>> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> 
> Hi Greg, 6.16.4-rc1 (6.16.3 + all patches from the stable queue from 24h ago) compiles fine for x86_64 using GCC 15.2.1+r22+gc4e96a094636 and binutils 2.45+r29+g2b2e51a31ec7, and the resulting kernel has been running without any discernible issues since roughly 00:00 UTC today on various physical machines of mine (Ivy Bridge, Haswell, Kaby Lake, Coffee Lake) and in a Zen 2 VM and a bunch of Kaby Lake VMs.
> 
> 
> Regards
> Pascal

Tested-by: Pascal Ernster <git@...dfalcon.net>