[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <81a8ba60-d07b-42f1-a3cd-25a11c9f1f45@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2025 20:50:53 +0530
From: ALOK TIWARI <alok.a.tiwari@...cle.com>
To: Bhargava Marreddy <bhargava.marreddy@...adcom.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
andrew+netdev@...n.ch, horms@...nel.org
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
michael.chan@...adcom.com, pavan.chebbi@...adcom.com,
vsrama-krishna.nemani@...adcom.com,
Vikas Gupta <vikas.gupta@...adcom.com>,
Rajashekar Hudumula <rajashekar.hudumula@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [v4, net-next 5/9] bng_en: Allocate packet buffers
On 8/26/2025 10:14 PM, Bhargava Marreddy wrote:
> +static void bnge_alloc_one_rx_ring_netmem(struct bnge_net *bn,
> + struct bnge_rx_ring_info *rxr,
> + int ring_nr)
> +{
> + u32 prod;
> + int i;
> +
> + prod = rxr->rx_agg_prod;
> + for (i = 0; i < bn->rx_agg_ring_size; i++) {
> + if (bnge_alloc_rx_netmem(bn, rxr, prod, GFP_KERNEL)) {
> + netdev_warn(bn->netdev, "init'ed rx ring %d with %d/%d pages only\n",
> + ring_nr, i, bn->rx_ring_size);
Looks good, but would bn->rx_agg_ring_size be more accurate here instead
of bn->rx_ring_size? since this loop is allocating the AGG ring.
> + break;
> + }
> + prod = NEXT_RX_AGG(prod);
> + }
> + rxr->rx_agg_prod = prod;
> +}
Thanks,
Alok
Powered by blists - more mailing lists