linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 7/7] KVM: TDX: Explicitly do WBINVD when no more TDX SEAMCALLs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CABgObfaZjcDvFVWO7rsr2e_M=F6r=sEq+GHjtEp04uhj29=MuA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2025 19:20:54 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>, dave.hansen@...el.com, bp@...en8.de, 
	tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, 
	thomas.lendacky@....com, x86@...nel.org, kas@...nel.org, 
	rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com, dwmw@...zon.co.uk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	kvm@...r.kernel.org, reinette.chatre@...el.com, isaku.yamahata@...el.com, 
	dan.j.williams@...el.com, ashish.kalra@....com, nik.borisov@...e.com, 
	chao.gao@...el.com, sagis@...gle.com, farrah.chen@...el.com, 
	Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 7/7] KVM: TDX: Explicitly do WBINVD when no more TDX SEAMCALLs

On Tue, Aug 26, 2025 at 7:10 PM Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com> wrote:
> Can you add a comment here to explain why this is done even if the kernel doesn't
> support kexec?  I've no objection to the superfluous flushing, but I've spent far
> too much time deciphering old commits where the changelog says one thing and the
> code does something else with no explanation.  I don't want to be party to such
> crimes :-)

I asked on the review for v6 to make this conditional on CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE
with a stub; Kai said he'd rather not and I acquiesced, but now it looks
like we're going to need a v8 just for this comment or to follow that
suggestion of mine, which I still prefer to a comment.

To be honest I've never felt so frustrated in ~10 years of participating
to Linux, and this is not even *my* code.  Not your fault though.

Kai, if you're also frustrated I can handle the v8.  As you prefer.

Paolo


Paolo