linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next 0/7] net: stmmac: fixes and new features

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e4cb25cb-2016-4bab-9cc2-333ea9ae9d3a@linux.dev>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2025 18:29:53 +0100
From: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev>
To: Konrad Leszczynski <konrad.leszczynski@...el.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
 andrew+netdev@...n.ch, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
 pabeni@...hat.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 cezary.rojewski@...el.com, sebastian.basierski@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/7] net: stmmac: fixes and new features

On 26/08/2025 12:32, Konrad Leszczynski wrote:
> This series starts with three fixes addressing KASAN panic on ethtool
> usage, Enhanced Descriptor printing and flow stop on TC block setup when
> interface down.
> Everything that follows adds new features such as ARP Offload support,
> VLAN protocol detection and TC flower filter support.

Well, mixing fixes and features in one patchset is not a great idea.
Fixes patches should have Fixes: tags and go to -net tree while features
should go to net-next. It's better to split series into 2 and provide
proper tags for the "fixes" part