linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] zram: refactor writeback helpers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aK4wFZzd3cwbGFIL@google.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2025 22:07:17 +0000
From: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
To: Richard Chang <richardycc@...gle.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, bgeffon@...gle.com,
	liumartin@...gle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] zram: refactor writeback helpers

On Thu, Jul 31, 2025 at 06:49:47AM +0000, Richard Chang wrote:
> Move writeback-related functions and data structures from zram_drv.[ch]
> to a new zram_wb.[ch] file. This is a pure refactoring patch with no
> functional changes, preparing the ground for the upcoming asynchronous
> writeback implementation.

Can we also move zram_writeback_slots and scan_slots_for_writeback(iow,
all the writeback related to sutff) into zram_wb.ch?