lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202508261333.8hcdJOVB-lkp@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2025 14:01:15 +0800
From: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: Nickolay Goppen <setotau@...dex.ru>,
	Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht,
	Nickolay Goppen <setotau@...dex.ru>,
	Richard Acayan <mailingradian@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] pinctrl: qcom: Add SDM660 LPASS LPI TLMM

Hi Nickolay,

kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:

[auto build test WARNING on 038d61fd642278bab63ee8ef722c50d10ab01e8f]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Nickolay-Goppen/pinctrl-qcom-lpass-lpi-Introduce-pin_offset-callback/20250825-045348
base:   038d61fd642278bab63ee8ef722c50d10ab01e8f
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250824-sdm660-lpass-lpi-v1-3-003d5cc28234%40yandex.ru
patch subject: [PATCH 3/3] pinctrl: qcom: Add SDM660 LPASS LPI TLMM
config: microblaze-randconfig-r123-20250826 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250826/202508261333.8hcdJOVB-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: microblaze-linux-gcc (GCC) 9.5.0
reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250826/202508261333.8hcdJOVB-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202508261333.8hcdJOVB-lkp@intel.com/

sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>> drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-sdm660-lpass-lpi.c:110:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sdm660_lpi_pinctrl_groups' was not declared. Should it be static?
>> drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-sdm660-lpass-lpi.c:148:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sdm660_lpi_pinctrl_functions' was not declared. Should it be static?

vim +/sdm660_lpi_pinctrl_groups +110 drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-sdm660-lpass-lpi.c

   109	
 > 110	const struct lpi_pingroup sdm660_lpi_pinctrl_groups[] = {
   111		LPI_PINGROUP(0, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _),
   112		LPI_PINGROUP(1, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _),
   113		LPI_PINGROUP(2, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _),
   114		LPI_PINGROUP(3, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _),
   115		LPI_PINGROUP(4, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _),
   116		LPI_PINGROUP(5, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _),
   117		LPI_PINGROUP(6, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _),
   118		LPI_PINGROUP(7, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _),
   119		LPI_PINGROUP(8, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _),
   120		LPI_PINGROUP(9, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _),
   121		LPI_PINGROUP(10, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _),
   122		LPI_PINGROUP(11, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _),
   123		LPI_PINGROUP(12, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _),
   124		LPI_PINGROUP(13, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _),
   125		LPI_PINGROUP(14, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _),
   126		LPI_PINGROUP(15, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _),
   127		LPI_PINGROUP(16, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _),
   128		LPI_PINGROUP(17, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _),
   129	
   130		/* The function names of the PDM GPIOs are derived from SDM670 */
   131		LPI_PINGROUP(18, LPI_NO_SLEW, pdm_clk, mclk0, _, _),
   132		LPI_PINGROUP(19, LPI_NO_SLEW, pdm_sync, _, _, _),
   133		LPI_PINGROUP(20, LPI_NO_SLEW, pdm_2_gpios, _, _, _),
   134		LPI_PINGROUP(21, LPI_NO_SLEW, pdm_rx, _, _, _),
   135		LPI_PINGROUP(22, LPI_NO_SLEW, comp_rx, _, _, _),
   136		LPI_PINGROUP(23, LPI_NO_SLEW, pdm_rx, _, _, _),
   137		LPI_PINGROUP(24, LPI_NO_SLEW, comp_rx, _, _, _),
   138		LPI_PINGROUP(25, LPI_NO_SLEW, pdm_rx, _, _, _),
   139		LPI_PINGROUP(26, LPI_NO_SLEW, dmic12, _, _, _),
   140		LPI_PINGROUP(27, LPI_NO_SLEW, dmic34, _, _, _),
   141		LPI_PINGROUP(28, LPI_NO_SLEW, dmic12, _, _, _),
   142		LPI_PINGROUP(29, LPI_NO_SLEW, dmic34, _, _, _),
   143	
   144		LPI_PINGROUP(30, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _),
   145		LPI_PINGROUP(31, LPI_NO_SLEW, _, _, _, _),
   146	};
   147	
 > 148	const struct lpi_function sdm660_lpi_pinctrl_functions[] = {
   149		LPI_FUNCTION(comp_rx),
   150		LPI_FUNCTION(dmic12),
   151		LPI_FUNCTION(dmic34),
   152		LPI_FUNCTION(mclk0),
   153		LPI_FUNCTION(pdm_2_gpios),
   154		LPI_FUNCTION(pdm_clk),
   155		LPI_FUNCTION(pdm_rx),
   156		LPI_FUNCTION(pdm_sync),
   157	};
   158	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ