[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250826062315.644520-3-visitorckw@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2025 14:23:15 +0800
From: Kuan-Wei Chiu <visitorckw@...il.com>
To: vbabka@...e.cz,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: cl@...two.org,
rientjes@...gle.com,
roman.gushchin@...ux.dev,
harry.yoo@...cle.com,
glittao@...il.com,
jserv@...s.ncku.edu.tw,
chuang@...nycu.edu.tw,
cfmc.cs13@...u.edu.tw,
jhcheng.cs13@...u.edu.tw,
c.yuanhaur@...tl.edu,
linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Kuan-Wei Chiu <visitorckw@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] mm/slub: Replace sort_r() with sort() for debugfs stack trace sorting
The comparison function used to sort stack trace locations in debugfs
never relied on the third argument. Therefore, sort_r() is unnecessary.
Switch to sort() with a two-argument comparison function to keep the
code simple and aligned with the intended usage.
Signed-off-by: Kuan-Wei Chiu <visitorckw@...il.com>
---
mm/slub.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index 081816ff89ab..39a238384892 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -7711,7 +7711,7 @@ static void *slab_debugfs_next(struct seq_file *seq, void *v, loff_t *ppos)
return NULL;
}
-static int cmp_loc_by_count(const void *a, const void *b, const void *data)
+static int cmp_loc_by_count(const void *a, const void *b)
{
struct location *loc1 = (struct location *)a;
struct location *loc2 = (struct location *)b;
@@ -7778,8 +7778,8 @@ static int slab_debug_trace_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filep)
}
/* Sort locations by count */
- sort_r(t->loc, t->count, sizeof(struct location),
- cmp_loc_by_count, NULL, NULL);
+ sort(t->loc, t->count, sizeof(struct location),
+ cmp_loc_by_count, NULL);
bitmap_free(obj_map);
return 0;
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists