[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250826064906.10683-1-yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2025 14:49:06 +0800
From: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>
To: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>
Cc: Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@...il.com>,
bpf@...r.kernel.org,
loongarch@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] LoongArch: BPF: Optimize sign-extention mov instructions
For 8-bit and 16-bit sign-extention mov instructions, it can use the native
instructions ext.w.b and ext.w.h directly, no need to use the temporary t1
register, just remove the redundant operations.
Here are the test results:
# modprobe test_bpf test_range=81,84
# dmesg -t | tail -5
test_bpf: #81 ALU_MOVSX | BPF_B jited:1 5 PASS
test_bpf: #82 ALU_MOVSX | BPF_H jited:1 5 PASS
test_bpf: #83 ALU64_MOVSX | BPF_B jited:1 5 PASS
test_bpf: #84 ALU64_MOVSX | BPF_H jited:1 5 PASS
test_bpf: Summary: 4 PASSED, 0 FAILED, [4/4 JIT'ed]
Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>
---
arch/loongarch/net/bpf_jit.c | 6 ++----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/loongarch/net/bpf_jit.c b/arch/loongarch/net/bpf_jit.c
index abfdb6bb5c38..7072db18c6cd 100644
--- a/arch/loongarch/net/bpf_jit.c
+++ b/arch/loongarch/net/bpf_jit.c
@@ -527,13 +527,11 @@ static int build_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct jit_ctx *ctx, bool ext
emit_zext_32(ctx, dst, is32);
break;
case 8:
- move_reg(ctx, t1, src);
- emit_insn(ctx, extwb, dst, t1);
+ emit_insn(ctx, extwb, dst, src);
emit_zext_32(ctx, dst, is32);
break;
case 16:
- move_reg(ctx, t1, src);
- emit_insn(ctx, extwh, dst, t1);
+ emit_insn(ctx, extwh, dst, src);
emit_zext_32(ctx, dst, is32);
break;
case 32:
--
2.42.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists