[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2a66319f-63f1-408b-8815-89254d68b90b@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2025 14:40:08 +0700
From: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Documentation <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Workflows <workflows@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Fox Foster <fox@...dis.ed.ac.uk>, Federico Vaga
<federico.vaga@...a.pv.it>, Jonathan Neuschäfer
<j.neuschaefer@....net>, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: management-style: Correct "know" past
participle
On 8/26/25 11:47, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
>> diff --git a/Documentation/process/management-style.rst b/Documentation/process/management-style.rst
>> index dfbc69bf49d435..1381b253b19ef4 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/process/management-style.rst
>> +++ b/Documentation/process/management-style.rst
>> @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ actually true.
>> The name of the game is to **avoid** having to make a decision. In
>> particular, if somebody tells you "choose (a) or (b), we really need you
>> to decide on this", you're in trouble as a manager. The people you
>> -manage had better know the details better than you, so if they come to
>> +manage had better known the details than you, so if they come to
>> you for a technical decision, you're screwed. You're clearly not
>
> This seems actively wrong ... ?
>
What I thought on the original wording was that the people (i.e.
developers) know the (technical) details better than their manager.
And yeah, "better" was duplicated.
Thanks.
--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
Powered by blists - more mailing lists