[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75Vcyr2gQ_Z7BV5nEJCSb1taWnBOfCfTWMQtMG-65Z+D0Dg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2025 11:05:35 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>,
Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>, Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/1] iio: dac: Remove redundant pm_runtime_mark_last_busy()
calls
On Mon, Aug 25, 2025 at 11:53 PM Sakari Ailus
<sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(), pm_runtime_put_sync_autosuspend(),
> pm_runtime_autosuspend() and pm_request_autosuspend() now include a call
> to pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(). Remove the now-reduntant explicit call to
> pm_runtime_mark_last_busy().
>
> Also clean up error handling in stm32_dac_set_enable_state().
TL;DR: I think this change makes it harder to follow (due to complex
conditional).
...
> ret = regmap_update_bits(dac->common->regmap, STM32_DAC_CR, msk, en);
> mutex_unlock(&dac->lock);
> - if (ret < 0) {
> + if (ret) {
> dev_err(&indio_dev->dev, "%s failed\n", str_enable_disable(en));
> - goto err_put_pm;
> + goto err_pm_put;
This is one time use for the label and we know that ret is set here.
Just
if (enable)
pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(dev);
return ret;
should work.
> }
...
> - if (!enable) {
> - pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(dev);
> - pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(dev);
> - }
> -
> - return 0;
> -
> -err_put_pm:
> - if (enable) {
> - pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(dev);
> +err_pm_put:
> + if (!enable || (enable && ret))
> pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(dev);
> - }
>
> return ret;
And here is as simple as
if (!enable)
pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(dev);
return 0;
and remove the unneeded label altogether with the error path.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists