[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6c6b183a-bce7-b01c-8749-6e0b5a078384@huaweicloud.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2025 09:13:41 +0800
From: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>
Cc: colyli@...nel.org, hare@...e.de, tieren@...as.com, axboe@...nel.dk,
tj@...nel.org, josef@...icpanda.com, song@...nel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, neil@...wn.name, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, yi.zhang@...wei.com, yangerkun@...wei.com,
johnny.chenyi@...wei.com, "yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 4/7] md/raid10: convert read/write to use
bio_submit_split()
Hi,
在 2025/08/25 18:59, Christoph Hellwig 写道:
>> allow_barrier(conf);
>> + bio = bio_submit_split(bio, max_sectors, &conf->bio_split);
>> wait_barrier(conf, false);
>> +
>> + if (!bio) {
>> + set_bit(R10BIO_Returned, &r10_bio->state);
>> + goto err_handle;
>> + }
>
> The NULL return should only happen for REQ_NOWAIT here, so maybe
> give R10BIO_Returned a more descriptive name? Also please document
> the flag in the header.
And also atomic write here, if bio has to split due to badblocks here.
The flag is refer to raid1. I can add cocument for both raid1 and raid10
in this case.
>
> Any maybe yhe code wants a splitting helper instead of open coding
> setting this flag in multiple places?
> .
>
Yes.
Thanks,
Kuai
Powered by blists - more mailing lists