[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aK2KHhaFqWbd5S_O@stanley.mountain>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2025 13:19:10 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
To: Qianfeng Rong <rongqianfeng@...o.com>
Cc: Dave Penkler <dpenkler@...il.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Michael Rubin <matchstick@...erthere.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: gpib: use int instead of u32 to store error
codes
On Tue, Aug 26, 2025 at 05:58:59PM +0800, Qianfeng Rong wrote:
> Use int instead of size_t for 'ret' variable to store negative error codes
> returned by bb_write().
>
The commit message needs to give a motivation. I would have assumed from
reading the patch that this caused a signedness bug but it doesn't.
The commit has no effect on runtime but fixing the type is a nice
cleanup. My commit message would say:
The "ret" variable is used to store the return from bb_write() returns
either zero on success or negative error codes on failure. Storing the
error codes in size_t which is an unsigned long, doesn't cause an issue
at runtime but it's ugly as pants. Change "ret" from size_t to int
type. No effect on runtime.
regards,
dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists