[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <84ae113c-3bf0-47cb-913b-45c75241a805@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2025 14:48:40 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>, Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>, "David S . Miller"
<davem@...emloft.net>, Andreas Larsson <andreas@...sler.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, Andy Lutomirski
<luto@...nel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>, Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
"Liam R . Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>, Nico Pache
<npache@...hat.com>, Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>,
Dev Jain <dev.jain@....com>, Barry Song <baohua@...nel.org>,
Xu Xin <xu.xin16@....com.cn>, Chengming Zhou <chengming.zhou@...ux.dev>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@...ux.dev>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>, Masami Hiramatsu
<mhiramat@...nel.org>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>, John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@...e.de>, Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@...il.com>, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] mm: add bitmap mm->flags field
On 12.08.25 17:44, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> We are currently in the bizarre situation where we are constrained on the
> number of flags we can set in an mm_struct based on whether this is a
> 32-bit or 64-bit kernel.
>
> This is because mm->flags is an unsigned long field, which is 32-bits on a
> 32-bit system and 64-bits on a 64-bit system.
>
> In order to keep things functional across both architectures, we do not
> permit mm flag bits to be set above flag 31 (i.e. the 32nd bit).
>
> This is a silly situation, especially given how profligate we are in
> storing metadata in mm_struct, so let's convert mm->flags into a bitmap and
> allow ourselves as many bits as we like.
>
> To keep things manageable, firstly we introduce the bitmap at a system word
> system as a new field mm->_flags, in union.
>
> This means the new bitmap mm->_flags is bitwise exactly identical to the
> existing mm->flags field.
>
> We have an opportunity to also introduce some type safety here, so let's
> wrap the mm flags field as a struct and declare it as an mm_flags_t typedef
> to keep it consistent with vm_flags_t for VMAs.
>
> We make the internal field privately accessible, in order to force the use
> of helper functions so we can enforce that accesses are bitwise as
> required.
>
> We therefore introduce accessors prefixed with mm_flags_*() for callers to
> use. We place the bit parameter first so as to match the parameter ordering
> of the *_bit() functions.
>
> Having this temporary union arrangement allows us to incrementally swap
> over users of mm->flags patch-by-patch rather than having to do everything
> in one fell swoop.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>
> ---
Incl. fixup LGTM
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
--
Cheers
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists